Faith, Blood, and Soil (Intro)

To Whom It Will Concern

“The greatest proof of decay is that the people will not look realities in the face and admit them.”

~T.S. Eliot

Every era of mankind is presented with a central problem. This problem and how they deal with it defines them. Their character, virtues, beliefs, traditions, and philosophies of life are put to the fire and tested. History forever remembers how this problem reshaped them or brought them to ruin. For the Greeks, it was political instability. The Romans, moral decay. Byzantine had the Turks and Medieval Christendom had the Moors. The central problem we face today in the 21st century: the genocide of the European.

This topic of conversation is not popular, politically appropriate, or even largely permitted in the public forum. In the West, we are discouraged from speaking of such things. We are asked to disregard the evidence of our senses and intuition and proceed blindly forward toward the cliffs. Of course, this makes perfect sense for those that seek our destruction, but why does the European abide? What does he gain from his silence and compliance?

It may be that the European suppresses his survival instincts for what he believes to be the greater good. He embraces his fall from glory and greatness as a form of almsgiving to the disadvantaged. Or perhaps he fears the immediate presence of the anti-white mob over the more distant existential threat of racial annihilation. For if he dare to protest his genocide, or even suggest that such a genocide exists, he will have exposed himself to the visceral hatred of the insatiable masses. Maybe it’s not a question of nobility or cowardice at all, but a willful surrender – a suicide. The European, thoroughly conditioned to hate his ancestors, severs the ties between his race and his identity. He shows nothing but compassion to all external groups but only holds contempt for his own. He no longer sees the point in preserving his identity, because his identity as a concept has already been ravaged beyond recognition.  

In all probability, the White man of modernity holds all of these views in one form or another. We have not only lost the will to fight, but many of us are entirely unaware that there is even a battle afoot. He may observe the smoke, but he knows not who carries the torch. His attackers seem almost ethereal. He senses danger lurking in the darkness but only sees shadows and shapes of those that rob, rape, and lie in wait. The European is stunned and confused at his own onslaught. He doesn’t feel as though he’s taken any blows directly, but somehow he now finds himself beaten down and on his knees. He questions how this happened but nobody answers him, and nobody is so bold as to tell the truth.

This was no surprise attack or grand assault. Our nemesis did not amass an army and march bravely upon us. He did not make his presence known and still to this day attempts to deny his enmity with his fingers crossed behind his back. The enemy, not through brute force, but from insidious scheming, has launched the greatest war of our age, and we have not yet begun to fight back. And therein lies the task of this paper – to awaken the European and return to him something worth fighting for.

This is obviously not a message for all mankind. This is not an attempt to reason with our adversary or persuade them to compromise. We care not for the opinions and sentiments of those who would see us extinct. This is a message for the besieged.

There are several presuppositions that we hold of the reader: that he is European, that he is Christian, and that he is discontent with the modern state of things. The presumption that the reader is of European descent should be self-evident. As to why it is critical that he is also of the Christian faith will become apparent in later chapters. His discontent is also necessary, for if the reader is perfectly happy despite his incipient doom, then we have nothing more to offer him here.

This is not a work of formalized political or moral theory. The intention is not to make an argument or validate concepts. We have volumes of literature in the Western cannon that articulate the philosophical foundations of all major themes this paper will incorporate. Within this text there is something stronger than definitions and justifications. This is an appeal to God, tradition, and identity. It is a message of hope, love, and humanity. It is a dire warning and a call to arms. For the sake of our very survival, we are issuing a plea for the European to come together, united under God, and form a nation unto themselves.

Due to the urgency of this matter, we will not waste time by softening the truth or evaluating our language to ensure it doesn’t offend delicate sensitivities. While it is not our purpose to insult, upset, or provoke the reader, one cannot be expected to speak honestly, boldly, and efficiently without doing so, especially as it concerns such controversial subjects. Be that as it may, it should be noted that this message is not one of hate, violence, or notions of racial supremacy; quite the opposite. As Christians, we do not embrace any of these evils. Instead, we hold ourselves to the virtues of love, compassion, and equality in the eyes of our Creator, for we are all made in His image and likeness.

It is all too common in modern discourse that if one speaks too highly of the White race, or suggests that the European should have a nation unto their own kind, that the speaker is proven a priori to be a “White supremacist.” And with this designation follows subsequent allegations such as racism, hate, and a predisposition toward violence against non-whites. Yet, a speaker could choose any other race on earth to advocate for, and he would not only be heard clearly, but endlessly acclaimed.

We reject this anti-philosophical sentiment. We also refuse to accept the categories levied against the man who speaks proudly of his blood and heritage. There is no privilege that we would afford the White man that would be denied to any other man. If the Africans, Arabs, Jews, and Asians can claim a homeland by, for, and of themselves, then we believe the European can as well – in fact, we mean to.

There is no delusion here. The goal is not to establish a utopic ideology or build some sort of Edenic nation. Our vision is that of something merely better than where we currently find ourselves. The methodology of our analysis can be described as a reawakening of tradition. We assert that our past reveals truths about our present. To find the answers that will allow us to correct course, we must look to the wisdom of our ancestors. For some of the problems that assail us today did not always exist, and we must ask ourselves why. Other problems of a more perennial nature that can be observed in history also provide instruction on how to overcome them or avoid them entirely. This isn’t to say that the Age of Yesterday is superior to modernity, but only that it is not inferior and that our predecessors may have something to teach us. It’s a fool’s errand to reject the counsel of his elders.

We aim to tell the truth here. To speak plainly about our circumstances and solutions. To address the troublemakers to their face – to name names. We propose, without apology, that the European can and should be proud of who he is. That his identity is legitimate and also under siege. Our mission is to elevate the souls of our kind, reveal the dark genocidal forces that are devouring us, and put the White race on a path to honor God, value themselves, reclaim their identity, and establish a home for their faith, blood, and soil.